Biomass-derived Materials in Battery and Capacitor Design

 Biomass-derived Materials in Battery and Capacitor Design

Biomass waste and byproducts have been identified as valuable resources for creating new materials for energy storage devices. Among the various biomass-derived materials, cellulose, lignin, and algae are the most commonly studied for batteries and capacitors. These materials offer several advantages, including abundance, low cost, biodegradability, and potential for recycling, aligning with the growing need for sustainable materials in the energy sector (Romani et al., 2020).

Research indicates that as lithium-ion batteries approach their end-of-life phase, efficient recycling becomes crucial for resource sustainability and ecological balance. Lin et al. (2023) provide a comprehensive overview of current lithium secondary battery recycling techniques, focusing on the importance of a holistic approach that integrates structure, recycling processes, material properties, and applications. The authors highlight various recycling methods, including pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical techniques, which are essential for recovering valuable materials such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel from spent batteries (Lin et al., 2023).

Kong et al.  (2018) researched on cellulose, which is the most abundant organic polymer on Earth. Cellulose has been explored for its potential as a precursor for carbon-based electrodes in lithium-ion batteries. Recent studies have demonstrated the use of cellulose and its derivatives in the production of bio-based electrodes, with promising electrochemical properties that rival those of conventional carbon materials (Kong et al., 2018). Furthermore, cellulose-based materials have been utilized for supercapacitors, where their high surface area and conductivity make them suitable for energy storage applications (Liu et al., 2019).

Lignin, a complex polymer found in plant cell walls, has also emerged as a promising material for energy storage devices. Lignin can be converted into carbon materials through pyrolysis, yielding electrodes with excellent electrical conductivity. Recent advancements focus on its use in fabricating electrodes for supercapacitors and batteries, emphasizing its plentiful functional groups and ability to form porous carbon structures. These lignin-based electrodes have demonstrated promising electrochemical properties, making them viable candidates for sustainable energy storage solutions. However, challenges remain in optimizing the separation processes and enhancing the performance consistency of lignin-derived materials (Liu et al., 2021).

Despite the advancements in recycling technologies and the development of sustainable materials, several challenges remain. The variability in the quality of recycled materials can affect the performance of new batteries (Lin et al., 2023).

Algae-based materials are another promising source of biomass for energy storage applications. Algae can be converted into carbon materials for batteries and capacitors, offering high surface area and good conductivity. In a study by Hu et al. (2021), algae-derived carbon was used in supercapacitors, achieving excellent electrochemical performance and stability over multiple cycles. This demonstrates the potential of algae-based materials for enhancing the performance of energy storage devices.

The exploration of biomass-derived materials for battery applications is gaining momentum. Abd Elkodous et al. (2022) discuss the potential of utilizing agricultural and industrial wastes (AIWs) as sustainable resources for fabricating nanomaterials that can enhance energy storage capabilities. By converting AIWs into nanomaterials, researchers can create composites that not only improve battery performance but also contribute to waste management solutions.

Recent advancements in all-organic polymer dielectrics have also shown promise in energy storage applications. Feng et al. (2023) review the progress made in developing polymer-based dielectric film capacitors with high energy storage capabilities. The study emphasizes the scalability and industrial production potential of these materials, making them suitable candidates for next-generation energy storage devices.

Biomass-derived carbon materials (BDCMs) are another promising thing that is gaining traction as viable alternatives for energy storage applications due to their sustainability, low cost, and abundance. This review synthesizes findings from several recent studies that explore the structural diversities, challenges, and future perspectives of BDCMs in battery technologies. BDCMs offer several natural advantages that make them suitable for use in batteries. Their renewable nature and biodegradability contribute to environmental sustainability, addressing the growing concerns associated with traditional fossil fuel-derived materials (Rehman et al., 2024). The ability to tailor the physical and chemical properties of BDCMs—such as pore structure, surface chemistry, and electrical conductivity—enhances their performance in energy storage applications (Wang et al., 2023).

The preparation methods for BDCMs significantly influence their structural characteristics and electrochemical performance. Common techniques include pyrolysis, hydrothermal carbonization, and chemical activation, which allow for the development of carbon materials with tailored structural properties (Zhao et al., 2023). For instance, biomass-derived hard carbon materials thermally treated at temperatures between 1200 °C and 1400 °C have been shown to exhibit optimal properties for sodium-ion storage (Yu et al., 2023). These methods not only affect the porosity and surface area but also enhance the electrochemical performance of the resulting materials.

Lignin, a byproduct of biomass processing, has shown promise as a sustainable material for developing high-performance nanocomposites. Lizundia et al. (2021) provide an overview of lignin's versatility in creating multifunctional nanocomposites and nanohybrids through its interactions with other biopolymers and nanoparticles. The authors highlight lignin's potential applications in flame retardancy, food packaging, electroactive materials, and energy storage.

Beg et al. (2024) discuss the potential of biodegradable biopolymers such as cellulose, chitin, and polylactic acid (PLA) to enhance the sustainability of batteries and supercapacitors. These materials offer exceptional biodegradability and functional properties, making them suitable candidates for EESDs within a circular economy framework.

The review emphasizes that incorporating biodegradable polymers can significantly reduce electronic waste associated with traditional battery technologies. However, challenges such as optimizing processing methods and ensuring adequate electrochemical performance must be addressed to fully realize their potential in commercial applications (Beg et al., 2024).

Recent studies have highlighted the use of various biomass sources, such as agricultural residues and forestry waste, to produce high-performing carbon anodes for lithium-ion batteries (Li et al., 2024). The structural diversity of these materials allows them to be adapted for different battery types, including lithium-ion, sodium-ion, and potassium-ion batteries (Rehman et al., 2024).

Emerging 3D Printable Materials for Energy Storage Devices

3D printing, particularly extrusion-based AM technologies such as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), offers significant advantages for the fabrication of customized components for energy storage devices. The ability to print intricate geometries with precise control over material distribution enables the optimization of energy storage devices for enhanced performance. This flexibility is particularly useful when working with biomass-derived materials, which can be tailored to meet the specific requirements of energy storage applications (Tai et al., 2019).

Recent advances in 3D printable inks have enabled the use of biomass-derived materials, such as cellulose, lignin, and chitosan, for fabricating components for batteries and capacitors. These materials offer high biocompatibility, mechanical strength, and conductivity, making them ideal candidates for energy storage devices. Emerging nanocellulose materials, extracted from agricultural biomass, have been developed for 3D printing applications, providing high surface area, biocompatibility, and ease of functionalization. These attributes enhance the potential of nanocellulose-based composites in energy storage, offering sustainable alternatives for electrodes in batteries and capacitors (Ee & Yau Li, 2021).

Zhakeyev et al. (2017) highlight that AM allows for the creation of complex 3D structures with high design freedom and minimal material waste. This capability is particularly beneficial for developing advanced energy storage devices, including batteries and fuel cells. The authors emphasize that AM can unlock unprecedented performance in energy materials that traditional manufacturing methods cannot achieve.

Recent advancements in AM have facilitated the production of customized energy devices tailored to specific applications. For instance, the integration of various materials through AM processes enables the fabrication of components with optimized properties (Zhakeyev et al., 2017). However, challenges remain regarding the scalability of these technologies and the need for standardized processes to ensure consistent quality across production batches.

The development of composite materials is another key trend in 3D printing for energy storage devices. By combining biomass-derived materials with conductive polymers or metal nanoparticles, researchers have been able to enhance the electrochemical performance of biomass-based electrodes. For instance, Romani et al. (2020) demonstrated the use of PLA-filled composites for 3D printing supercapacitors, showing that the incorporation of biomass waste materials into the composite improved both the mechanical and electrochemical properties of the printed electrodes.

Natural fibers derived from biomass sources are increasingly being explored for their ability to enhance the mechanical properties of composites while maintaining environmental sustainability. The ongoing research emphasizes the importance of optimizing processing techniques to improve the compatibility between natural fibers and polymer matrices, which is crucial for achieving desirable performance characteristics in AM processes (Molaiyan et al., 2024).

The most commonly used biomass raw materials in the context of 3D printing include cellulose, chitin, and lignin. These materials are favored due to their abundance, renewability, and favorable mechanical properties. For instance, cellulose extracted from agricultural waste has been successfully utilized to create biodegradable filaments suitable for 3D printing (Zhou et al., 2021). Similarly, chitin derived from shrimp waste has shown promise as a biopolymer for developing sustainable composites (Zhou et al., 2021).

The extrusion-based AM processes have been adapted to incorporate these natural fibers into composite materials. Techniques such as fused deposition modeling (FDM) allow for precise control over material deposition and structure formation, enabling the production of complex geometries that can enhance the performance of energy storage devices (Bi & Huang, 2022).

As per the findings of Zhou et al., 2021, Figure 2 illustrates the fabrication process of a 3D-printed lithium-ion battery featuring a sandwich structure, utilizing carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), silver nanowires (AgNWs), and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) for the cathode, and lithium titanate (LTO) for the anode. The inks demonstrated excellent rheological properties, indicating their suitability for 3D printing applications in flexible electronic components, while also showcasing promising electrochemical characteristics.

Extrusion-based AM Processes for Biomass-derived Energy Storage Devices

Extrusion-based AM processes, such as FDM, offer a simple yet effective way to fabricate energy storage devices using biomass-derived materials. These processes work by melting and extruding material through a nozzle to form a layer-by-layer structure, allowing for precise control over the final product's shape and properties (Sun et al., 2020).

In their work, Li et al. (2020) demonstrated the potential of extrusion-based AM for fabricating battery electrodes from cellulose-based filaments. The study showed that cellulose could be successfully extruded into fine filaments and used to create highly conductive electrodes, significantly improving the battery’s performance. Similar work by Tai et al. (2019) explored the use of lignin-based filaments for printing fuel cell components, further underscoring the versatility of extrusion-based AM for energy storage and conversion applications.

Applications in Renewable Energy and Fuel Cells

Additive manufacturing technologies have been successfully applied to the development of fuel cells, another critical area of energy storage. Fuel cells, which convert chemical energy into electrical energy, are highly efficient and environmentally friendly, making them a key technology for renewable energy applications.

Tai et al. (2019) demonstrated the potential of AM for the fabrication of polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell components using biomass-derived materials. The study highlighted the ability of AM to create complex structures with enhanced performance, which is difficult to achieve with conventional manufacturing methods. This application of AM could lead to more cost-effective and efficient production of fuel cell components, further promoting the use of renewable energy sources.

The review by Sebbani et al. (2024) explores the technical, environmental, and economic aspects of fuel cells, particularly focusing on the environmental impact of hydrogen production and the economic feasibility of adopting fuel cell technologies. This aligns with the growing interest in developing extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) processes that utilize biomass-derived materials for energy storage applications, including fuel cells and electrolyzers.

In the context of AM, the incorporation of new 3D printable materials derived from biomass offers opportunities to fabricate components for fuel cells, such as membranes and electrodes, with enhanced properties. These materials, including lignin and cellulose, contribute to the sustainable development of fuel cell technology by reducing reliance on fossil fuels and minimizing the carbon footprint. The integration of AM technologies in fuel cell production allows for precise customization of components, leading to improved performance and efficiency.

Badwal et al. (2014) further discuss the role of electrochemical systems in renewable energy, highlighting the potential of emerging technologies such as fuel cells and supercapacitors. The adoption of additive manufacturing techniques in the fabrication of these energy systems offers significant advantages, including reduced material waste, enhanced design flexibility, and the ability to utilize renewable raw materials. As research progresses, the focus on optimizing AM processes for energy storage applications is expected to grow, addressing challenges related to material performance, scalability, and cost.

 

Table 1: Comparison of Biomass-Derived Materials

Aspect	Biomass Material	Applications	Advantages	Challenges	Key References
Cellulose	Cellulose	Lithium-ion batteries, supercapacitors	Abundance, biodegradability, high surface area, and good conductivity	Processing complexity and variability in performance	Kong et al. (2018), Liu et al. (2019)
Lignin	Lignin	Batteries, supercapacitors	Functional groups, porous carbon structures, electrical conductivity	Optimization of separation processes, performance consistency	Liu et al. (2021), Lizundia et al. (2021)
Algae	Algae	Batteries, supercapacitors	Renewable source, high conductivity, excellent electrochemical stability	Stability across multiple cycles	Hu et al. (2021)
AIW-Derived Nanomaterials	Agricultural and industrial wastes (AIWs)	Batteries, capacitors	Waste management solutions, performance enhancement	Scalability and processing optimization	Abd Elkodous et al. (2022)
BDCMs	Biomass-derived carbon materials (BDCMs)	Sodium-ion batteries, capacitors	Renewable, low-cost, tailorable physical and chemical properties	Consistency in material properties	Rehman et al. (2024), Zhao et al. (2023)
Polymer Dielectrics	Polymers (e.g., PLA, cellulose derivatives)	Capacitors	Scalability, high energy storage capabilities, industrial production potential	Challenges in large-scale industrial adoption	Feng et al. (2023), Romani et al. (2020)
Emerging 3D Printable Materials	Cellulose, lignin, chitin, nanocellulose	Customized batteries and capacitors	Biocompatibility, functionalization ease, mechanical strength, and minimal material waste	Scalability of AM processes, need for standardized production	Tai et al. (2019), Ee & Yau Li (2021)
Composite Materials for AM	Biomass with conductive polymers or metals	Electrodes for batteries and capacitors	Enhanced mechanical and electrochemical performance	Compatibility optimization between natural fibers and polymer matrices	Zhou et al. (2021), Bi & Huang (2022)
Natural Fibers	Cellulose, chitin, lignin	3D-printed battery and capacitor components	Abundance, renewability, favorable mechanical properties	Ensuring high-quality and scalable production processes	Zhakeyev et al. (2017), Molaiyan et al. (2024)
Extrusion-based AM Processes	Biomass-derived filaments (e.g., cellulose, lignin)	Energy storage device components	Precise material control, optimized properties, layer-by-layer structure	Achieving uniformity and maintaining quality in batch production	Sun et al. (2020), Li et al. (2020), Tai et al. (2019)
Recycling Techniques	Lithium secondary batteries	Recycling lithium, cobalt, nickel	Resource sustainability, ecological balance	Variability in quality of recycled materials	Lin et al. (2023)
Nanocomposites	Lignin with biopolymers or nanoparticles	Flame retardancy, food packaging, energy storage	Versatility, multifunctionality	Consistency in material performance	Lizundia et al. (2021)
All-Organic Polymer Dielectrics	Polymers (PLA, cellulose)	Capacitors	High energy storage capabilities, environmental sustainability	Addressing electrochemical performance challenges	Feng et al. (2023), Beg et al. (2024)
Fuel Cells	Biomass-derived components	Renewable energy applications	High efficiency, environmentally friendly, customizable designs	Complex manufacturing processes	Tai et al. (2019)

 

 

 

 

References

Badwal, S. P. S., Giddey, S. S., Munnings, C., Bhatt, A. I., & Hollenkamp, A. F. (2014). Emerging electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2(79). https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2014.00079

Beg, M., Jeeva Saju, Alcock, K. M., Achu Titus Mavelil, Prasutha Rani Markapudi, Yu, H., & Libu Manjakkal. (2024). Biodegradable Biopolymers for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices in a Circular Economy. RSC Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4su00468j

Bi, X., & Huang, R. (2022). 3D printing of natural fiber and composites: A state-of-the-art review. Materials & Design, 222, 111065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111065

Calignano, F., Tommasi, T., Manfredi, D., & Chiolerio, A. (2015). Additive Manufacturing of a Microbial Fuel Cell—A detailed study. Scientific Reports, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17373

Chu, W., Calise, F., Duić, N., Østergaard, P. A., Vicidomini, M., & Wang, Q. (2020). Recent Advances in Technology, Strategy and Application of Sustainable Energy Systems. Energies, 13(19), 5229. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195229

Ee, L. Y., & Yau Li, S. F. (2021). Recent advances in 3D printing of nanocellulose: structure, preparation, and application prospects. Nanoscale Advances. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0na00408a

Feng, Q.-K., Zhong, S.-L., Pei, J.-Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, D.-L., Liu, D.-F., Zhang, Y.-X., & Dang, Z.-M. (2021). Recent Progress and Future Prospects on All-Organic Polymer Dielectrics for Energy Storage Capacitors. Chemical Reviews, 122(3), 3820–3878. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00793

Lin, J., Zhang, X., Fan, E., Chen, R., Wu, F., & Li, L. (2023). Carbon neutrality strategies for sustainable batteries: from structure, recycling, and properties to applications. Energy & Environmental Science, 16(3), 745–791. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE03257K

Lizundia, E., H. Sipponen, M., G. Greca, L., Balakshin, M., L. Tardy, B., J. Rojas, O., & Puglia, D. (2021). Multifunctional lignin-based nanocomposites and nanohybrids. Green Chemistry, 23(18), 6698–6760. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC01684A

M. Abd Elkodous, Hamad, H., Mohamad, Ali, Mouna El Abboubi, Bedir, A. G., Eldeeb, A., Ayed, A. A., Zineb Gargar, Zaki, F. S., Dina, Matsuda, A., Abdelnour, M. R., Sabra, B. A., El‐Sayed, A. A., Abdelrazek, T. A., Abdelhameed, S. T., Gharieb, M. A., Rabee, M. M., & Aboeldiar, S. A. (2022). Cutting-edge development in waste-recycled nanomaterials for energy storage and conversion applications. Nanotechnology Reviews, 11(1), 2215–2294. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0129

Nur, K., Varol Intasanta, & Hoven, V. P. (2024a). Current significance and future perspective of 3D-printed bio-based polymers for applications in energy conversion and storage system. Heliyon, e25873–e25873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25873

Palanivel Molaiyan, Bhattacharyya, S., Simoes, G., Sliz, R., Paolella, A., & Lassi, U. (2024). Towards Greener Batteries: Sustainable Components and Materials for Next-Generation Batteries. Green Chemistry, 26(13), 7508–7531. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3gc05027k

Rehman, W. ur, Ma, Y., khan, Z., Zahra, F., Xu, J., Farooq, U., Ghani, A., Rehman, H., & Xu, Y. (2024). Biomass-derived carbon materials for batteries: Navigating challenges, structural diversities, and future perspective. Next Materials, 7, 100450–100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100450

Romani, A., Suriano, R., & Levi, M. (2023). Biomass waste materials through extrusion-based additive manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 386, 135779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135779

Sebbani, I., Ettouhami, M. K., & Boulakhbar, M. (2025). Fuel Cells: A Technical, Environmental, and Economic Outlook. Cleaner Energy Systems, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cles.2024.100168

Sun, C., Wang, Y., McMurtrey, M. D., Jerred, N. D., Liou, F., & Li, J. (2021). Additive manufacturing for energy: A review. Applied Energy, 282, 116041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116041

Tai, X. Y., Zhakeyev, A., Wang, H., Jiao, K., Zhang, H., & Xuan, J. (2019). Accelerating Fuel Cell Development with Additive Manufacturing Technologies: State of the Art, Opportunities and Challenges. Fuel Cells, 19(6), 636–650. https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.201900164

Wang, J., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Ma, Y., & Ma, L. (2020). Recent progress of biomass-derived carbon materials for supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources, 451, 227794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227794

Zhakeyev, A., Wang, P., Zhang, L., Shu, W., Wang, H., & Xuan, J. (2017). Additive Manufacturing: Unlocking the Evolution of Energy Materials. Advanced Science, 4(10), 1700187. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700187